The Oil-For-Food Dollar amounts.
In a previous post, Kevin and I were listing numbers that were wildly different. I wasn't sure as to why we had numbers between 200 million and 23 billion. So, knowing Kevin and being uncertain as to my numbers, I did some checking to make sure I wasn't talking out of my you-know-what.
I found the following statement(pdf file) by Sen Carl Levin (D-MI) that had some numbers in it that probably is based on the current info the Senate has. Might the numbers change? It's possible based on further investigation. What else I learned is that Saddam got his money through different avenues. I always thought it was just the Oil-for-food program.
But Saddam repeatedly inflated the dollar amount of the humanitarian contracts and obtained kickbacks from these contracts and the oil sales to the tune of at least $1.7 billion.
Saddam’s abuse of the Oil-for-Food program, however, provided only a fraction – about one-sixth -- of Iraq’s total illicit income. According to the Duelfer Report, the vast majority – nearly three-quarters – of Saddam’s illicit income during the sanctions period was generated through publicly disclosed trade agreements, called “protocols,” to sell Iraqi oil to its neighbors: primarily Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.
It shows that the trade agreements, which were not part of the Oil-for-Food Program, were the largest single source -- 75% -- of Iraq’s illicit income, generating $8 billion out of a total that was estimated in the Duelfer Report to be $10.7 billion. According to the Duelfer Report, the Oil-for-Food program, which began in 1996, generated about $1.7 billion through kickbacks and surcharges to Saddam, or about 16% of Iraq’s total illicit income during the sanctions period.
Also, we evidently knew about the protocol program and did nothing about it.
So this was an interesting research project and gives me a better understanding of what we are debating.


4 Comments:
What the hell are all them strange symbols???
The symbols are a common tactic with copyrighted material. Although that particular symbol is a new one to me. Usually it's an exclamation mark. The point being that it'd be a lot of work to manually go in and fix the text so that it looks like it was generated by whomever uses it. At least that's my assumption. I do know that I've seen the exclamation marks in newspaper articles from archives.
About a year ago I purchased an article from the Oregonian that was about my parents experiences surviving the Rwandan genocide in '96 or whenever it was. I was given explicit approval to use the article as long as it wasn't in a for-profit format. But, it was loaded with exclamation marks even so.
As for the $ figures... I thought my last comment downboard was specifying that the $200+ million was what Saddam was skimming off the top of the oil contracts. I'll have to go look again.
Hey Kevin, That is what you said about the 200 million. I was researching all the different numbers I'd been hearing. Not really saying anyone was wrong...just trying to find specific breakdowns.
That's odd about the symbols because it's from the Committee doing the Senate Hearing.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home